Showing posts with label Jets. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jets. Show all posts
Thursday, April 25, 2013
2013 BQB Mock Draft Challenge
We're back with a preview of the 2013 NFL Draft, which starts tonight at New York's Radio City Music Hall. Last year, we graded 7 mock drafts and our friend Peter King came out on top. This year, we'll look at the same set of mock drafts from last year, with two changes -- Mike Mayock replaces Charley Casserly (who, as of this writing, hasn't updated a mock draft in a few days), and Kash Money, last year's last place finisher, drops out, as he (she?) doesn't appear to have published a mock draft this year.
Let's meet the mock drafters:
Thursday, November 1, 2012
Week 9 Preview and Picks
![]() |
| Cam Newton's Panthers have as many wins as he has fingers up, but that's likely to change in the second half of the season |
Our new
layout and avatar lasted all of a week. Last
week, we looked at the best- and worst-case scenarios for newly-appointed
Chiefs starting QB Brady Quinn, whose picture adorned the side of this blog
and served as our Twitter avatar. Quinn’s
line in his start against Oakland? 2-for-4
for 1 yard, 1 interception, and 1 head injury. Yikes.
Matt Cassel returns to the starting lineup tonight, and Brady Quinn returns
to the top of the webpage (albeit with a friend whose wardrobe we detailed here).
As we hit
the midpoint of the 2012 NFL season, we look at teams who have deviated
significantly from their early season performance. More than a few have started out either hot
or cold and currently resemble a far different team than they did in weeks
1-3. A deeper dive after the jump.
Thursday, October 18, 2012
Week 7 Preview and Picks
![]() |
| Our model says losing Revis will cost the Jets a little over a game this year |
[10/19 update, 9:30 a.m.: A brief word on last night's game, which was played following the original publishing of this post. As we tweeted and put on Facebook last night, we took the Niners to cover the 7.5 point spread. You know what happened. We'd just like to go on record as saying that we agree with Harbaugh's decision. Declining the penalty leads to a single kneel-down to end the game. Accepting it -- and taking the safety -- leaves the possibility, however remote, that Seattle could go onside kick --> score --> onside kick --> score. The chances are low with 45 seconds and no timeouts, and yes, something crazy could happen on the snap for the kneel-down, but if the BackupQB were coaching the Niners, he'd have done the same thing.
Our original post starts after the jump . . .]
Our original post starts after the jump . . .]
Friday, October 12, 2012
Week 6 Preview and Picks
![]() |
| "No, Coach Haley, I can't believe the BQB has us in the playoffs either . . ." |
Pittsburgh looked like garbage last night in their 26-23 loss to lowly Tennessee. Yesterday, we predicted the Steelers win but not cover the 6-point spread, which might have been true had Mike Tomlin not turned into Strom Thurmond with his conservative play-calling during the Steelers’ two-minute drill. Pittsburgh kicker Shaun Suisham (nicknamed “Po Sweezy” by his teammates) had hit a career-long 52-yarder earlier in the fourth quarter. So Tomlin trotted him out there for a 54-yarder with 50 seconds on the clock and Tennessee having used none of its timeouts. Shockingly, Suisham’s kick came up short, and Tennessee took advantage of terrific field position to waltz down the field for Rob Bironas’ game-winner.
Steeler Nation can’t be happy about last night’s result, but there can be happy about how weak the competition looks for the AFC Wild Card especially the second one. Entering this weekend, exactly 5 of the AFC’s 16 teams are over .500. Which means that, barring a resurgence from one of the teams at the very bottom of the conference, (at least) one of these teams is making the playoffs:
2-2 or 2-3 Teams in the AFC
Team (record)
|
Best win
|
Road record
|
Point Differential
|
Colts (2-2)
|
GB
|
0-1
|
-29
|
Steelers (2-3)
|
PHI
|
0-3
|
+1
|
Jets (2-3)
|
At MIA
|
1-1
|
-34
|
Bills (2-3)
|
KC
|
1-2
|
-58
|
Dolphins (2-3)
|
At CIN
|
1-2
|
0
|
Broncos (2-3)
|
PIT
|
0-2
|
+21
|
TOTAL
|
3-11
|
-99
| |
Ugh. This list doesn’t even include Cincinnati, who, at 3-2, isn’t exactly striking fear into opponents but to has a stranglehold on the other wild card at this point.
We listed road record because it seems relevant given that one of these teams is likely to be a wild card and will likely be heading into San Diego / New England / Baltimore in round 1. Think the Chargers, Pats, and Ravens won’t be licking their chops (not to mention gamblers looking to bet on them?).
As the last few years have proven, all you have to do is get in to make some noise (*cue Giants fans nodding*), so there’s hope for fans of all 6 of these teams. But if this were college basketball and it were March, all you’d hear is Dick Vitale and Jay Bilas yapping about how weak the bubble was in the AFC this year and how wrong it is that Minnesota can’t get into the playoffs just because it’s in the wrong conference.
![]() |
| Dickie V would probably think the Vikings are getting a RAW DEAL if one of the 2-win AFC makes the playoffs |
Our projections are now weighted 65/35, with preseason ratings making up 65% of our rating and Pythagorean Expectation making up the remaining 35%.
AFC
Division Champs: Texans (11.2 expected wins), Ravens (11.2), Chargers (9.5), Patriots (8.7)
Wild Cards: Bengals (9.3), Steelers (8.6)
Out: Jets (8.2), Broncos (7.1); In: Patriots, Steelers
NFC
Division Champs: Niners (13.6), Falcons (12.4), Bears (12.3), Eagles (9.8)
Wild Cards: Cardinals (11.0), Packers (9.4)
No changes from last week
WEEK 6 PICKS
Nothing new this week in terms of analyses. We do need to do a refresh for injuries, as teams like the Jets, who have lost Darrelle Revis and Santonio Holmes for the season, should have their ratings discounted as a result. But in the interest of getting this out by press time, we haven’t included those effects yet. As in the past two weeks, we are giving 1.5 points’ of credit to the four teams coming off a bye (Cowboys, Raiders, Bucs, and Lions) and another 1.2 points to the two teams playing at home in primetime (Chargers and Texans).
For some reason, we like a lot of home teams this week. That seems to be just a coincidence, home advantage is just as strong as it always is (2.6 points).
LAST WEEK: 6-8 against the spread, 8-6 outright
THIS WEEK: 1-0 against the spread, 0-1 outright
SEASON: 40-34-4 against the spread (.541), 51-27 overall (.654)
(picks in order of confidence, outright winner in parentheses)
SEAHAWKS +3.5 over Patriots (Seahawks)
JETS -3 over Colts (Jets)
CHARGERS -1 over Broncos (Chargers)
NINERS -6.5 over Giants (Niners)
REDSKINS -1.5 over Vikings (Redskins)
BUCS -4 over Chiefs (Bucs)
CARDINALS -4.5 over Bills (Cardinals)
Packers +3 over TEXANS (Texans)
RAVENS -3.5 over Cowboys (Ravens)
Bengals -2 over BROWNS (Bengals)
DOLPHINS -4 over Rams (Dolphins)
Lions +3 over EAGLES (Eagles)
Raiders +9 over FALCONS (Falcons)
Note: Shout-out to Brady Quinn, who will relinquish his backup duties and get the start on Sunday. If he keeps the job, we might have to change our avatar . . .
Note: Shout-out to Brady Quinn, who will relinquish his backup duties and get the start on Sunday. If he keeps the job, we might have to change our avatar . . .
Think we’re crazy? Think we’re brilliant? Tell us in the comments!
Follow us on Twitter @TheBackupQB
Idea for a post? Email backupquarterback@gmail.com
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Week 2 Recap / Week 3 Preview
![]() |
| Somewhere, Rod Tidwell is smiling at the Cardinals' early season success |
A quick look at where we hit and missed in week 2, highlighting the plights of 5 teams:
1. Cardinals: Our boldest predictions of the '12 season involved the Cardinals and their Week 2 opponents, New England. We were bullish on Arizona (our model had them at 10+ wins and a playoff berth) and seemed to be the only people on the planet bearish on New England (sub .500 for the first time since 2000). Cardinals +13.5 was our lock of the week last week, and it hit, with plenty of room to spare.
The craziest part of the Cardinals' victory was that WR Larry Fitzgerald was all but absent from it; Fitzgerald had a single catch for 4 yards on Arizona's opening drive. We figured the Cardinals' defense would be good this year, and through 2 weeks, the numbers justify that premise: their 34 points allowed is second in the AFC, and Football Outsiders ranks their defense 8th of 32. Patrick Peterson is the household name, but look for names like LB Daryl Washington, LB Paris Lenon, and DE Calais Campbell to become part of NFL vernacular as the season rolls on. We wouldn't be surprised if all 3 make the Pro Bowl.
2. Patriots: Arizona was a pretty good team, so New Englanders should stop short of entering full-fledged panic mode. Having said that, the problems on the o-line shouldn't be too shocking -- we had the Pats' offseason fifth worst in the AFC, largely due to losing Matt Light, the most valuable player lost by any AFC team. Light's weighted value of 65 was second only to Carl Nicks (84; he went from New Orleans to Tampa in the NFC). Brandon Lloyd hasn't proven himself able to get in sync with Tom Brady, and New England is missing Deion Branch more than many thought it would. It gets no easier for the Patriots this week playing in Baltimore, home of the NFL's best home field advantage, even with the "Bill Belichick after a loss" corollary looming (more on that below).
3. Niners: 2 playoff teams from last year, 2 convincing -- if not blow-out -- victories for San Francisco, the BQB's Super Bowl pick at the start of the season. The big story here is still QB Alex Smith, who improved on last year's ranking and currently ranks second in QB rating and fourth in ESPN's Total QBR. Again, this is a guy who ranked 22nd in Total QBR last year, and his team went 13-3. If Smith can even crack the top half of QBs this year, watch out.
4. Jets: Fans of our other Super Bowl pick, the Jets, came back to earth this week following a 27-10 loss in Pittsburgh. The Jets have long had trouble with the Steelers, especially in Pittsburgh, but Mark Sanchez's 10-for-27 performance was downright ugly, especially against a Steelers D missing 2 starters. Which Sanchez is the real one -- the one who put up 48 points against Buffalo or the one who got shut out in the second half against the Steelers? We probably won't find out this week, when the Jets travel to lowly Miami. But we'll definitely know in 2 weeks, when they play the Niners. Stay tuned.
5. Texans: We didn't have the Texans in the playoffs at the start of the season. At the same time, our model did have them starting 2-0 against two weak opponents, the Dolphins and the Jaguars. Which they did. No big deal. And while the model now has them in the playoffs -- due as much to the putridity of the rest of the AFC South than anything else -- they face a brutal stretch the next 5 games:
Week 3: At Denver
Week 4: Home vs. Tennessee
Week 5 At New York Jets
Week 6: Home vs. Green Bay
Week 7: Home vs. Baltimore
Houston lucks out in playing the toughest teams in that stretch (Green Bay and Baltimore) at home, but regardless, they could be a half decent team and go 2-3 or even 1-4 in that stretch. Bottom line: we should know a lot more about the Texans by mid-October.
![]() |
| "Hmmm . . . that schedule looks pretty tough the next 5 weeks . . ." |
UPDATED PLAYOFF PREDICTIONS
See last week's post for our methodology. We've adjusted the weightings to 81% preseason rating and 19% Pythagorean Expectation for this year.
AFC Division Champs (in order of seed): Chargers (10.9 expected wins), Ravens (10.3), Jets (10.1), Texans (9.3)
AFC Wild Cards: Steelers (9.9), Bengals (8.9)
New since last week: Bengals; Dropped out: Patriots (7.7)
NFC Division Champs: Niners (13.9), Eagles (11.8), Falcons (11.2), Packers (11.2)
NFC Wild Cards: Cardinals (11.1), Saints (10.9)
New since last week: Packers; Dropped out: Bears (10.8)
Again, it's worth pointing out the NFC's superiority over the AFC; through 2 weeks, NFC teams are 7-1 against the AFC (Indy's win over Minnesota was the AFC's lone win). We're projecting 7 10-win teams in the NFC and just 3 in the AFC.
WEEK 3 PREVIEW
Everybody and their mother is yapping about how the Patriots are unbeatable after a loss in the Belichick era. We at the BQB took it upon ourselves to crunch the numbers.
Patriots Record After a Loss and After a Win, Bill Belichick Era
Year
|
Record
After a Loss
|
Record
After a Win
|
2000
|
4-6
|
1-4
|
2001
|
4-1
|
7-3
|
2002
|
3-4
|
5-3
|
2003
|
2-0
|
12-1
|
2004
|
2-0
|
11-2
|
2005
|
5-0
|
4-6
|
2006
|
3-1
|
8-3
|
2007
|
0-0
|
15-0
|
2008
|
5-0
|
5-5
|
2009
|
3-1
|
5-6
|
2010
|
2-0
|
11-2
|
2011
|
2-1
|
10-2
|
2012
|
0-0
|
0-1
|
Total
|
35-14 (.714)
|
94-38 (.712)
|
Since
2003
|
24-3 (.889)
|
81-27 (.750)
|
Taking the Belichick era as a whole, the Pats win almost exactly as often after a loss as after a win -- the difference in win percentage is 0.2% Since 2003, the difference is a little more pronounced -- those who speak only in headlines would shout that the Pats have lost back-to-back games only 3 times in the past 10 seasons. And though they'd be right, the fact remains that New England was really good after wins too; they were ~14% more likely to win after a loss than after a win. That's a little more significant, but not nearly as much as many are pontificating. For our part, we won't consider it as we assess New England's chances in the Sunday night game at Baltimore, where they're 3 point dogs.
WEEK 3 PICKS
(Note: our model actually had Arizona winning outright last week (no joke), but we failed to print that. To avoid such issues in the future, we're listing our picks both outright and against the spread from here on out.)
Last week, against the spread: 9-4-3
Season, against the spread: 18-11-3 (.581)
Season, outright: 24-8 (.750)
Season, outright: 24-8 (.750)
Week 3 picks (in order of confidence):
PANTHERS +1 over Giants (Panthers to win outright)
Bucs + 7 over COWBOYS (Bucs)
Niners -7 over VIKINGS (Niners)
Bengals + 3.5 over REDSKINS (Bengals)
CARDINALS +4 over Eagles (Cardinals)
Jaguars +3 over COLTS (Jaguars)
TITANS + 3.5 over Lions (Lions)
Falcons + 3 over CHARGERS (Chargers)
BEARS -9 over Rams (Bears)
Steelers -4 over RAIDERS (Steelers)
RAVENS -3 over Patriots (Ravens)
SAINTS -9 over Chiefs (Saints)
Bills -3 over BROWNS (Bills)
BRONCOS +2 over Texans (Texans)
Jets -3 over DOLPHINS (Jets)
Packers -3.5 over SEAHAWKS (Packers)
Think we're crazy? Think we're brilliant? Tell us in the comments!
Like us on Facebook at facebook.com/backupquarterbackblog
Think we're crazy? Think we're brilliant? Tell us in the comments!
Like us on Facebook at facebook.com/backupquarterbackblog
Follow us on Twitter at twitter.com/TheBackupQB
Idea for a post? Email backupquarterback@gmail.com
Thursday, September 13, 2012
Week 1 Recap / Week 2 Preview
![]() |
| Alex Smith, unsung hero in the Niners' impressive 30-22 Week 1 victory over Green Bay |
Our season preview ruffled some feathers last week, especially in Massachusetts. Let's take a quick look at where we hit and where we missed base on week 1's results.
Where we were right: Niners, Jets, Cardinals, Bears
Niners: Our projections had San Francisco winning a whopping 14 games this year and winning the Super Bowl, and beating the Packers at Lambeau went a long way toward cementing them as one of the NFL's elite teams. Most of the hype was about the defense -- the Packers had only 7 points in the first 3 quarters -- and the Niners' 186 yards on the ground. Not enough is being said about QB Alex Smith who had an incredibly efficient line of 20/26, 211 yards, 2 TDs, no picks, and a passer rating of 125.6. Smith's ESPN QBR was 8th in the league last week. Last year, he was 22nd and the Niners were a fumble away from the NFC Title Game. If he can remain a top 10 quarterback in the league, watch out. Look for San Fran to continue their dominance against Detroit, who looked rather pedestrian in a home win against St. Louis last week.
Jets: Remember the preseason when the Jets scored one offensive touchdown? So much for that. The offense looked pristine against an admittedly-overmatched Bills defense in putting up 48 points, the most by a Jets team since week 4 of the 2008 season, when Brett Favre put up a 56 spot on an Arizona defense that ended up going to the Super Bowl. (That was a weird sentence to write.) Much was written this offseason about the Jets lack of offensive weapons -- specifically a #2 WR. Through a week, rookie Stephen Hill and journeyman Jeremy Kerley seem more than up to the task. They face a tougher challenge in Pittsburgh on Sunday.
Cardinals: It was ugly, and it barely involved John Skelton, but Arizona got a win they had to have if they're going to compete this year. As expected, the Cards defense was solid, holding Seattle and rookie QB Russell Wilson to a single touchdown. New QB Kevin Kolb is probably the more talented QB than Skelton, and for now, we're not budging from our 10-win prediction from the Cardinals.
Bears: If Brandon Marshall could catch, the Bears' 41-21 might have been even more lopsided. As expected, the Bears took care of business against #1 overall pick Andrew Luck and the Colts. As expected, the reuniting of Jay Cutler and Marshall proved potent, with the two hooking up 9 times for 119 yards and a TD, even with all the drops. Huge game tonight for Chicago -- if they can get a win, they'll open up a 2 game lead on Green Bay with the tiebreak, and will be in good position to cruise into the bye week (next 3 games: home for St. Louis, at Dallas, at Jacksonville, then the bye).
Where we were wrong: Patriots, Saints, Steelers, Broncos
Patriots: The Pats' 3-touchdown win over Tennessee was even more lopsided than the score indicates. New England's tight ends create matchup problems our model doesn't adequately capture, and if Stevan Ridley is going to be as good as he looked in week 1, New England could be as good as the rest of the public thinks they'll be. I also have to note that the Pats draft picks -- we ranked their draft worst in the NFL -- came through in a big way on Sunday. Even "worst pick in the draft" Tavon Wilson had an interception. Maybe Bill Belichick & Co. are just that good as talent evaluators.
Saints: So much for Bountygate rallying the Saints, who stumbled to their first loss at the Superdome since 2010 in the stunner of the week. RG3's debut was the big story here, but the porous Saints' D looked as bad as ever, and mental mistakes plagued New Orleans all day (not a shocker given that they had their interim interim head coach at the helm). Big divisional road game for New Orleans at Carolina this week.
Steelers / Broncos: This game was tighter than the 31-19 final score indicated, but you really can't say enough about Peyton Manning. Every other writer / blogger has gushed about Manning so we won't do so here, except to note the success he had in Indianapolis with an otherwise-average team: from 2002 to 2010, the Colts won 10 games every year and qualified for the playoffs every year. Denver's D is better than Indy's ever was. If Denver can keep Manning upright, they might be more of a force than we thought in a weak AFC West.
As for Pittsburgh, our other Conference runner up (along with the Saints), the defense looked like it was missing 3 starters from last year (James Farrior, William Gay, and Ryan Clark). We'll see if they're able to have any success against the Sanchez/Tebow combo in what suddenly becomes a big home game this week.
UPDATED PLAYOFF PROJECTIONS
Every week, we'll update our playoff projections by revamping our expected wins calculation each week:
1. Project the rest of the season: Use our preseason rankings (85% weight) and a team's Pythagorean expectation from this season (15% weight) -- we'll amend those weightings as the season goes on (skewing away from preseason rankings) to get expected wins for the next 15 games
2. Add number of wins so far (in this case, 1 if the team won last week, 0 if they lost)
Using the Jets as an example:
Initial rating: 10.9
Pythagorean expectation based on 48-28 win: 48^2 / (48^2 + 28^2) = 0.75*16 = 11.9
New expected wins (16 games): 11.1 (10.9 x 85% + 11.9 x 15%)
New expected wins (15 games, since 1 is already played): 10.4 (11.1 x 15 / 16)
Wins so far: 1
New expected wins: 10.4 + 1 = 11.4
AFC Division Champs (in order of seed): Jets (11.4 wins), Ravens (11.2), Chargers (10.0), Texans (8.5)
AFC Wild Card: Steelers (9.0), Patriots (8.4)
Added: Texans, Patriots Dropped out: Bengals (8.1), Titans (6.9)
NFC Division Champs: Niners (13.9), Saints (12.0), Bears (12.0), Eagles (11.7)
NFC Wild Card: Falcons (10.9), Cardinals (10.8)
Added: Falcons Dropped out: Packers (10.6)
WEEK 2 PREVIEW
We live in a world of instant reaction (or, if you prefer, instant overreaction), and with 5 20+ victories in week 1, followers of the NFL are no different. In recent years, however, we've seen a big reversion to the mean in week 2 with blowout winners in week 1. In fact, teams that won their opening game by 20 points or more are just 1-6 against the spread in week 2 since 2009 and just 2-5 outright. This implies that spreads move big time based on the first week's results -- maybe too much.
The 5 big winners last week were the Jets, Patriots, Texans, Bears, and Ravens. Just 2 are favorites (Patriots and Texans) in week 2. Our picks project that trend to largely continue; of the 5 big winners last week, we only have the Jets covering the spread.
![]() |
| Maybe the Pats will get points if Gronk successfully completes a spike this week. They might need them to cover the 2 touchdown spread against Arizona. |
WEEK 2 PICKS, in order of confidence:
Cardinals + 13.5 over PATRIOTS
Bucs + 7 over GIANTS
BENGALS -7 over Browns
FALCONS -3 over Broncos
NINERS -7 over Lions
EAGLES -1 over Ravens
Saints -3 over PANTHERS
BILLS -3 over Chiefs
COLTS +1.5 over Vikings
DOLPHINS +1 over Raiders
Redskins -3 over RAMS
JAGUARS +7 over Texans
CHARGERS -6 over Titans
Jets + 5.5 over STEELERS
SEAHAWKS +3 over Cowboys
PACKERS -4.5 over Bears
Last week: 9-7
Enjoy Week 2. See you next week.
Think we're crazy? Think we're brilliant? Tell us in the comments!
Like us on Facebook at facebook.com/backupquarterbackblog
Follow us on Twitter at twitter.com/TheBackupQB
Follow us on Twitter at twitter.com/TheBackupQB
Idea for a post? Email backupquarterback@gmail.com
Friday, September 7, 2012
The Official Backup Quarterback Blog 2012 Season Predictions
![]() |
| Patrick Willis: the most important player on the BQB's Super Bowl pick |
Also at long last, the culmination of our offseason work: our 2012 season predictions. We took all the relevant info we looked at during the season, put it together, and voila -- projected records for our 32 teams. Here's how we did it:
1. Expected wins: We started with a team's expected wins from 2011, as determined by Pythagorean expectation.
2. New coaches get a bump: Since teams with new coaches typically see a bump of 1.5 wins the following year, we added 1.5 wins to the 7 teams who changed coaches this year.
3. Draft: We rated every team's draft, normalized those rankings to a 0 to 100 scale, and added or subtracted wins based on how they drafted (up to a cap of +/- 2, so the best team gained 2 wins and the worst team lost 2 wins).
4. Offseason: We assessed offseason movement (non-rookies) for each team (AFC and NFC), normalized those, and added or subtracted wins based on where they fell (the cap here was +/- 4)
5. Preseason: The preseason barely matters, but it seems to matter a little when teams go undefeated or winless; if a team went undefeated, we added a win, if it went winless, we subtracted one.
6. Schedule: We took the result of the first 5 steps, used it to run teams head-to-head (home advantage = 1 game), then took the weighted average of:
- The original projected wins # (75%) and
- Number of wins when you run the schedule (25%)
We then normalized the records so that, in total, teams would go 256-256 (since every game must be won or lost).
Disclaimer: We realize this isn't the be-all and end-all of projections, and that they're fairly quantitative and not at all subjective. Having said that, we got some reasonable results in spots and, perhaps most notably, have 6 repeat playoff teams and 6 new playoff teams, about the average over the past 10 years.
After the jump, our ratings, predictions, and week 1 picks!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)









