Friday, October 26, 2012

Feast your eyes . . .

There are no words . . .
Just a heads-up, Pittsburgh's going with its throwbacks this season.  The BQB's email box has been blowing up with pictures and descriptions -- from jailbird to bumblebee to things I can't print on the internet.

Suffice to say the RG3 and the Redskins -- Pittsburgh's opponents on Sunday -- will be distracted.

Also, if you missed it, our week 8 preview / picks column is here.  We nailed our pick of the week last night.  That one may come back to bite Minnesota come playoff time.  The Vikes now sit at 5-3; given the inequality of the 2 conferences, it's totally feasible that a 10-6 team misses the playoffs in the NFC.

Enjoy the weekend's games.

Think we're crazy?  Think we're brilliant?  Tell us in the comments.
Email: backupquarterback@gmail.com
Become a Twitter follower @TheBackupQB
Become a Facebook fan: facebook.com/backupquarterbackblog

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Week 8 Preview and Picks

Romeo, would you like to buy a pronoun?
Chiefs Head Coach Romeo Crennel announced Monday that he was replacing starting quarterback Matt Cassel – he of the 6-year, $63 million contract – with former first-rounder and, until this week, the face of this blog, one Brayden Tyler Quinn.  (As you can see, we’ve changed our avatar to reflect that Quinn is, in fact, no longer a backup QB).  Crennel opened a competition the week before last – a move lambasted by many but supported by, among others, our friends at Caught Looking -- and announced this week that Quinn would be the starter for the forseeable future.

Crennel’s rationale:

“I felt like the most impactful move I could make to get everybody’s attention was to change the quarterback.  I think that will get everybody’s attention, and hopefully that impacts the team because the quarterback position is the one that has the spotlight on him . . .

We need to coach better and we need to play better, and if we do things, we can be better, but my biggest deal was my gut was telling me we need to impact that team by changing that dynamic.”

Right on, Romeo.  Not sure we had a coherent English sentence in there, but the read I’m getting is that you want to shake things up for your 1-5 football team.  Fair enough.
Does this ever work?  After the jump, we had a look at the value of quarterback continuity over the past 2 seasons.

Thursday, October 18, 2012

Week 7 Preview and Picks

Our model says losing Revis will cost the Jets a little over a game this year

[10/19 update, 9:30 a.m.: A brief word on last night's game, which was played following the original publishing of this post.  As we tweeted and put on Facebook last night, we took the Niners to cover the 7.5 point spread.  You know what happened.  We'd just like to go on record as saying that we agree with Harbaugh's decision.  Declining the penalty leads to a single kneel-down to end the game. Accepting it -- and taking the safety -- leaves the possibility, however remote, that Seattle could go onside kick --> score --> onside kick --> score.  The chances are low with 45 seconds and no timeouts, and yes, something crazy could happen on the snap for the kneel-down, but if the BackupQB were coaching the Niners, he'd have done the same thing.

Our original post starts after the jump . . .]


Friday, October 12, 2012

Week 6 Preview and Picks

"No, Coach Haley, I can't believe the BQB has us in the playoffs either . . ."
Pittsburgh looked like garbage last night in their 26-23 loss to lowly Tennessee.  Yesterday, we predicted the Steelers win but not cover the 6-point spread, which might have been true had Mike Tomlin not turned into Strom Thurmond with his conservative play-calling during the Steelers’ two-minute drill.  Pittsburgh kicker Shaun Suisham (nicknamed “Po Sweezy” by his teammates) had hit a career-long 52-yarder earlier in the fourth quarter.  So Tomlin trotted him out there for a 54-yarder with 50 seconds on the clock and Tennessee having used none of its timeouts.  Shockingly, Suisham’s kick came up short, and Tennessee took advantage of terrific field position to waltz down the field for Rob Bironas’ game-winner.
Steeler Nation can’t be happy about last night’s result, but there can be happy about how weak the competition looks for the AFC Wild Card especially the second one.  Entering this weekend, exactly 5 of the AFC’s 16 teams are over .500.  Which means that, barring a resurgence from one of the teams at the very bottom of the conference, (at least) one of these teams is making the playoffs:
2-2 or 2-3 Teams in the AFC
Team (record)
Best win
Road record
Point Differential
Colts (2-2)
GB
0-1
-29
Steelers (2-3)
PHI
0-3
+1
Jets (2-3)
At MIA
1-1
-34
Bills (2-3)
KC
1-2
-58
Dolphins (2-3)
At CIN
1-2
0
Broncos (2-3)
PIT
0-2
+21
TOTAL
3-11
-99


Ugh.  This list doesn’t even include Cincinnati, who, at 3-2, isn’t exactly striking fear into opponents but to has a stranglehold on the other wild card at this point.

We listed road record because it seems relevant given that one of these teams is likely to be a wild card and will likely be heading into San Diego / New England / Baltimore in round 1.  Think the Chargers, Pats, and Ravens won’t be licking their chops (not to mention gamblers looking to bet on them?).

As the last few years have proven, all you have to do is get in to make some noise (*cue Giants fans nodding*), so there’s hope for fans of all 6 of these teams.  But if this were college basketball and it were March, all you’d hear is Dick Vitale and Jay Bilas yapping about how weak the bubble was in the AFC this year and how wrong it is that Minnesota can’t get into the playoffs just because it’s in the wrong conference.

Dickie V would probably think the Vikings are getting a
RAW DEAL if one of the 2-win AFC makes the playoffs

Updated Playoff Projections
Our projections are now weighted 65/35, with preseason ratings making up 65% of our rating and Pythagorean Expectation making up the remaining 35%.

AFC
Division Champs: Texans (11.2 expected wins), Ravens (11.2), Chargers (9.5),  Patriots (8.7)
Wild Cards: Bengals (9.3), Steelers (8.6)
Out: Jets (8.2), Broncos (7.1); In: Patriots, Steelers

NFC
Division Champs: Niners (13.6), Falcons (12.4), Bears (12.3), Eagles (9.8)
Wild Cards: Cardinals (11.0), Packers (9.4)
No changes from last week

WEEK 6 PICKS
Nothing new this week in terms of analyses.  We do need to do a refresh for injuries, as teams like the Jets, who have lost Darrelle Revis and Santonio Holmes for the season, should have their ratings discounted as a result.  But in the interest of getting this out by press time, we haven’t included those effects yet.  As in the past two weeks, we are giving 1.5 points’ of credit to the four teams coming off a bye (Cowboys, Raiders, Bucs, and Lions) and another 1.2 points to the two teams playing at home in primetime (Chargers and Texans).

For some reason, we like a lot of home teams this week.  That seems to be just a coincidence, home advantage is just as strong as it always is (2.6 points).

LAST WEEK: 6-8 against the spread, 8-6 outright
THIS WEEK: 1-0 against the spread, 0-1 outright
SEASON: 40-34-4 against the spread (.541), 51-27 overall (.654)

(picks in order of confidence, outright winner in parentheses)
SEAHAWKS +3.5 over Patriots (Seahawks)
JETS -3 over Colts (Jets)
CHARGERS -1 over Broncos (Chargers)
NINERS -6.5 over Giants (Niners)
REDSKINS -1.5 over Vikings (Redskins)
BUCS -4 over Chiefs (Bucs)
CARDINALS -4.5 over Bills (Cardinals)
Packers +3 over TEXANS (Texans)
RAVENS -3.5 over Cowboys (Ravens)
Bengals -2 over BROWNS (Bengals)
DOLPHINS -4 over Rams (Dolphins)
Lions +3 over EAGLES (Eagles)
Raiders +9 over FALCONS (Falcons)

Note: Shout-out to Brady Quinn, who will relinquish his backup duties and get the start on Sunday.  If he keeps the job, we might have to change our avatar . . .

Think we’re crazy?  Think we’re brilliant?  Tell us in the comments!
Follow us on Twitter @TheBackupQB
Idea for a post?  Email backupquarterback@gmail.com

Thursday, October 11, 2012

Week 6: Thursday night pick

More to come tomorrow, but we're picking Tennessee + 6 tonight.

Pittsburgh is 0-2 on the road this year.  Both losses are to sub-.500 teams, including at lowly Oakland, where they blew multiple 10-point leads.  Pittsburgh will be without Troy Polamalu (again) and without LaMarr Woodley (for the first time).

Tennessee hasn't exactly been the '94 Niners, but they got embarrassed last week, and as we saw in New York on Monday night, teams who get embarassed the week before typically at least put up a fight.

This is all without the model (which is currently being tweaked), but, with neither team having much going for it, we're taking the 6 points at home.  Take Pittsburgh to win outright, but Tennessee against the spread.

Check back tomorrow for the rest of the week 6 picks.  Enjoy the game tonight.


Think we're crazy?  Think we're brilliant?  Tell us in the comments!
Like us on Facebook at facebook.com/backupquarterbackblog
Follow us on Twitter at twitter.com/TheBackupQB
Idea for a post?  Email backupquarterback@gmail.com

Friday, October 5, 2012

Week 5 Preview and Picks

Vikings fans have come a long way from the dog days of Moss and Culpepper
First things first: we couldn't have been more wrong about last night's pick.  Here's hoping Kevin Kolb still has all of his limbs attached after getting sacked nine times last night.

Onward to the rest of the week, where we pause to look at a surprise juggernaut in Minneapolis.  The Vikings quietly sit tied with the Bears atop the NFC North standings with a 3-1 record.  Among those chiefly responsible for their ascent?  QB Christian Ponder, who ranks 10th in ESPN's Total QBR ratings, ahead of Philip Rivers, Eli Manning, Aaron Rodgers, Matthew Stafford, Cam Newton, Michael Vick, Drew Brees, and Tony Romo, among others.  Ponder was 29th in last year's rankings and is a big reason for Minnesota's turnaround.

Our preseason model didn't think much of Minnesota, projecting only 1.7 wins, a total they nearly doubled in September alone, and we had them worst in the NFC in free agency.  But those rankings only took into account performance to date, not potential, and we knew the Vikings would be going with a youth movement this year.  We called out their young / inexperienced starting guards, Brandon Fusco and Charlie Johnson, calling the guard position a "potential nightmare" this year.  The 2 have performed admirably; Minnesota has the #6-ranked offensive line in the league on the run and is in the middle of the pack in the rare instances they throw the ball.  Sometimes your young players perform, sometimes they don't.  The former appears true so far in Minnesota, with Fusco, Johnson, and Ponder leading the way.

How long might the fun continue in the great white north?  While no one (ourselves included) is picking Minnesota to outlast Green Bay or Chicago, the schedule appears friendly in the near term:

Week 5: TITANS (1-3)
Week 6: at Redskins (2-2)
Week 7: CARDINALS (4-1)
Week 8: BUCS (3-1)
Week 9: at Seahawks (2-2)
Week 10: LIONS (1-3)

Minnesota could have trouble with any of the 5, but none stand out as a clear loss.  Is it so crazy to think the Vikes will go 4-2 over this stretch and be sitting at 7-3 with 6 games to play?

The bye follows week 10 and, with it, the Vikings may well fall back to earth -- their 6-game stretch run includes 2 games apiece against Chicago and Green Bay as well as road games in St. Louis and Houston.  So enjoy it while it lasts, Vikings fans.

UPDATED PLAYOFF PROJECTIONS
For those scoring at home, we're weighting our preseason projections at 73%, and season-to-date Pythagorean performance at 27% (note: we're debating bringing down the preseason weighting at a faster clip going forward).  As always, expected wins are in parentheses.

AFC Division Champs: Ravens (10.4), Texans (10.4), Chargers (9.9), Jets (9.0)
AFC Wild Cards: Bengals (9.7), Broncos (8.8)
New to the field: Broncos; Dropped out: Bills (7.9)

NFC Division Champs: Niners (13.1), Falcons (11.9), Bears (11.3), Eagles (9.8)
NFC Wild Cards: Cardinals (11.0), Packers (10.3)
No changes since last week

DO TEAMS PLAY BETTER AFTER THE BYE?
A few of the lines looked a bit off this week -- particularly the 1-2 Steelers, who are 3 point favorites at home against 3-1 Philadelphia.  A lot of the pundits assessing this game cite that the Steelers are coming off a bye and will likely be with the services of Troy Polamalu, James Harrison, and Rashard Mendenhall, none of whom have suited up this year.

Isn't great that we've got a bye this week?  ISN'T IT!?

In this instance, it's clear the bye week helps the Steelers.  Conventional wisdom holds that in general, regardless of a team's injury situation, it does better after a bye.  We sought to set that theory, along with the corollary -- if it does, has Vegas caught on?

We looked at every game played since 2008 where one team was coming off a bye and the other was not.  There were 111 such games.  58 times the team coming off the bye played at home, 53 on the road.  Teams win games by an average of 2.5 points, so we would have expected teams coming off the bye to win by a very small amount -- it turns out to be 0.1 points.  In reality, teams coming off a bye won by an average of 1.6 points, implying a 1.5 point benefit from coming off a bye.

So, has Vegas caught on yet?  Somewhat.  In the same set of games, the team coming off the bye was favored by an average of 0.6 points.  So Vegas gave them an extra half point, when in reality they should be giving them an extra 1.5 points.

The result?  Teams coming off a bye are 59-47-5 against the spread since 2008, good for 55.7%.  It's not a slam-dunk by any stretch, but there does appear to be some value, all things equal, in picking teams after a bye.  Good news for the Colts and Steelers this week, both of whom got a 1.5-point bump when we crunched the numbers for our picks this week.

WEEK 5 PICKS
Our model still doesn't think all that much of the Texans, Vikings, and Patriots, and that's reflected in our picks below.  The Jets, despite all their injuries, may represent Houston's toughest test to date.  A resounding win at MetLife Stadium will go a long way toward convincing us that the Texans are a legitimate Super Bowl contender.

LAST WEEK: 7-8 against the spread, 11-4 outright
SEASON: 33-26-4 against the spread (.559), 43-20 overall (.717)
THIS WEEK: 0-1 against the spread, 0-1 outright

(in order of confidence, outright winner in parentheses):

JETS +9 over Texans (Jets)
Titans +5.5 over VIKINGS (Titans)
Broncos +6.5 over PATRIOTS (Patriots)
SAINTS -3.5 over Chargers (Saints)
CHIEFS +6 over Ravens (Ravens)
Browns + 8.5 over GIANTS (Giants)
BENGALS -3 over Dolphins (Bengals)
COLTS +7 over Packers (Packers)
PANTHERS -3 over Seahawks (Panthers)
STEELERS -3 over Eagles (Steelers)
REDSKINS +3 over Falcons (Falcons)
NINERS -9.5 over Bills (Niners)
Bears -4.5 over JAGUARS (Bears)


Think we're crazy?  Think we're brilliant?  Tell us in the comments!
Like us on Facebook at facebook.com/backupquarterbackblog
Follow us on Twitter at twitter.com/TheBackupQB
Idea for a post?  Email backupquarterback@gmail.com


Thursday, October 4, 2012

Week 5: Thursday Night Pick

We'll be back tomorrow with the week 4 review / week 5 preview and picks.  For now, we like the Cardinals -2.5 tonight, both against the spread and to win straight-up, with a pretty high degree of confidence.  (We haven't run the numbers yet, but I would suspect this game will be in the top 4 or 5 in terms of our confidence level among the 14 games this weekend.)

While we think St. Louis is sneaky-good (or at least sneaky-not-that-bad), their offense is the worst in the league according to Football Outsiders.  Meanwhile, Arizona's defense is ranked sixth.  Translation: St. Louis might struggle to get into double digits.

More tomorrow.  Stay tuned.


Think we're crazy?  Think we're brilliant?  Tell us in the comments!
Like us on Facebook at facebook.com/backupquarterbackblog
Follow us on Twitter at twitter.com/TheBackupQB
Idea for a post?  Email backupquarterback@gmail.com